Crafting Impactful Prompts for Lawyers: Examples, Practical Use, and Tips

AI is quickly becoming an integral part of everyday legal work, with lawyers relying on tools such as ChatGPT and Spellbook to draft language, analyze contracts, and support document review. 

As the use of AI grows, so does the need for one crucial skill: knowing how to talk to it. The way a prompt is framed can significantly impact the quality of an AI response. Vague requests can lead to missed details, off-topic responses, and unusable results.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to use AI to assist with legal work and find tips to help you get more accurate, relevant, and reliable results from your AI prompts.

Best Prompts for Lawyers and Legal Use (ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity, and More)

Legal professionals are adopting AI across practice areas. Whether you need to analyze evidence in litigation, advise clients on compliance updates, or draft legal documents for transactional matters, effective prompting is key to getting useful AI output.

Legal Research and Analysis

AI can help surface relevant case law, summarize statutes, and assist with identifying key issues. Always review legal precedents for accuracy and jurisdictional relevance, and verify that AI outputs are properly tailored to the specific requirements of your jurisdiction.

Check out this guide on ChatGPT for Lawyers for more workflow tips and prompt examples.

Prompt Examples:

• “Summarize the key holdings from Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in plain English.”
• “List possible legal issues in a commercial lease dispute under California law.”
• “Interpret Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as it applies to content moderation policies.”

Drafting and Review

AI can speed up the early-stage tasks of drafting legal documents, reviewing contracts, and refining clauses. Tools like Spellbook automate redline suggestions and offer clause alternatives to help lawyers assess the impact of various contract versions during contract negotiations.

Prompt Examples:

• “Draft a mutual indemnification clause for a SaaS agreement.”
• “What red flags would you look for in a commercial lease termination clause?”
• “Summarize the key obligations in this service-level agreement.”

Litigation Support

AI can support litigation teams by assisting with drafting discovery, summarizing depositions, or outlining arguments. However, it cannot replace a lawyer's expertise in legal nuances, tone of language, and strategic reasoning.

Prompt Examples:

• “Draft initial interrogatories for a personal injury case involving a workplace slip and fall.”
• “Summarize this deposition transcript into key admissions and inconsistencies.”
• “List potential weaknesses in this motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.”

Legal Strategy and Risk

AI tools can provide you with more strategic options. Spellbook’s clause benchmarking feature refers to industry standards to help identify contract risks and inconsistencies that could be overlooked during manual review.

Prompt Examples:

• “What are the potential legal risks in offering a freemium pricing model for healthcare software?”
• “Suggest strategic arguments for challenging a non-compete clause in New York.”
• “Identify common contractual risks in M&A term sheets.”

Client Communication

Clear communication with clients is essential. Lawyers can use AI to explain legal updates or case progress in plain language. AI can help simplify complex information without sacrificing professionalism.

Prompt Examples:

• “Write a client update explaining a court delay in non-technical terms.”
• “Summarize this privacy policy update for a general audience.”
• “Draft an email explaining the implications of a pending settlement offer.”

Compliance and Policy

AI can assist lawyers in drafting or updating internal policies related to employment, data protection, or industry-specific regulations. Lawyers must subsequently review AI’s output to ensure legal and operational accuracy.

Prompt Examples:

• “Generate a bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policy that complies with HIPAA.”
• “Summarize the GDPR implications of tracking email engagement data.”
• “Create a checklist for documenting internal compliance reviews at a fintech company.”

How to Effectively Use Prompts for Lawyers

Here are considerations for writing effective prompts while ensuring the ethical use of AI: 

Always Review and Verify the Output

No matter how polished the result looks, AI-generated legal content should never be used without human review. Lawyers must verify citations, validate facts and interpretations, and confirm that the output aligns with jurisdictional rules and ethical standards. Think of AI as a junior assistant, not a licensed practitioner.

Be Clear, Contextual, and Directive in Prompts

Vague prompts lead to vague results. To get meaningful output, include context in prompts, such as the jurisdiction, relevant legal topic, and the format or tone you’re aiming for.

For example, instead of asking: "What should I include in an NDA?"

Try: "List five clauses commonly used in NDAs for SaaS vendors operating in California and present them in bullet format."

Clear and specific prompts will deliver more accurate and actionable AI responses. 

Protect Client Confidentiality and Sensitive Data

Never input client names, dates, case numbers, or other identifiable details into unsecured AI tools. Even when using a secure platform, it's best practice to anonymize scenarios, especially when working with sensitive or confidential information.

Whenever possible, maintain the use of private environments, as with Spellbook’s Microsoft Word integration, to continue working in a secure, familiar workflow.

Use Iterative Prompting to Refine Responses

Getting the most useful output often takes more than one try. If the first draft feels off, use follow-up prompts to clarify tone, expand ideas, or correct details. This is especially useful when trying to interpret laws in complex jurisdictions or comply with regulations related to industries such as finance or healthcare.

AI tools like Spellbook, which are designed specifically for legal workflows, respond effectively to iterative, back-and-forth prompting. If you’re considering using it, you can find tips for writing effective prompts in Spellbook from this guide.

Prompt Crafting Tips for Lawyers

Use these tips to improve your output quality and ensure your results meet the standards of legal practice. 

• Be Specific About Legal Domain and Jurisdiction: Include the legal area and jurisdiction to help the AI produce context-appropriate output. A clause under U.S. law can differ significantly from one under Canadian law.
• Set the Role or Perspective Clearly: Define the AI’s role, such as “act as a legal assistant” or “explain to a client”, to guide tone, depth, and structure more effectively.
• Use Step-by-Step Instructions: Break complex prompts into smaller steps to improve focus. For example: “Outline the main NDA clauses. Then highlight potential vendor risks.” This approach improves clarity and keeps responses on track.
• Include Examples to Guide Tone or Format: To get the right tone or format, include an example, such as a clause or summary. This helps the AI stay consistent, especially in formal or industry-specific contexts.
• Add Constraints to Limit Scope or Depth: Use constraints to keep outputs focused and manageable—e.g., “List three issues,” “Limit to 200 words,” or “Exclude tax considerations,” to reduce irrelevant content and improve clarity.

Risks and Limitations when Using AI Prompts

Lawyers should be cautious of over-relying on AI, as it can lead to errors, bias, and ethical issues. Mitigate these risks by applying sound judgment, verifying outputs, and ensuring alignment with professional standards. Considerations include:

• AI Hallucinations: Hallucinations occur when AI generates false information, such as fabricated citations or misinterpreted case law. Legal-specific tools such as Spellbook significantly reduce this risk. But human verification is always necessary before using outputs in formal legal materials.
• Confidentiality Breaches: Entering sensitive data into public AI tools risks client confidentiality because many platforms store user input. Use anonymized prompts and secure systems to protect private information.
• Bias in Output: AI may reflect bias from its training data. Use prompts that request neutral language and watch for unintended tone, especially in sensitive legal contexts.
• Lack of Legal Judgment: Use AI to brainstorm, not to replace experience, because it may not understand how to apply precedents, discretion, or ethical nuance. 

Why Spellbook Provides Better Legal AI Support for Legal Professionals

Most AI tools aren't built for legal work. Spellbook offers legal-aware design, safeguards, and workflow integrations that support speed, accuracy, and ethical use.

1. Purpose-Built for Legal Work

• Spellbook is trained on contracts, clause structures, and legal language. This reduces hallucinations and improves relevance, whether you're creating new documents or reviewing critical edits for accuracy and consistency.

2. Integrated Legal Workflows

• Spellbook works inside Microsoft Word. There’s no need to switch platforms or learn new systems. It fits directly into your current process, helping you review contracts for risk and revise language without breaking focus.

3. Accuracy with Guardrails

• Spellbook uses clause libraries, benchmark suggestions, and customizable playbooks to flag risks, catch inconsistencies, and match firm standards. Jurisdiction-aware prompts and built-in templates support compliance and style consistency in high-volume legal work.

Spellbook makes this all possible because it has its own custom GPT built on top of OpenAI. If you want to look into having a custom GPT, here's a guide on how law firms use custom GPTs to get you started.

Key Takeaways

• Prompt quality directly impacts AI usefulness in legal tasks.
• The structure, clarity, and context of a prompt can improve the relevance of the output.
• Spellbook offers legal-specific tools that minimize risk and maximize legal workflow efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

 What are the Key Components of an Impactful AI Prompt for Legal Tasks?

An impactful AI prompt for legal tasks should include a clear role definition, jurisdiction, legal context, task specificity, and output format to produce accurate, relevant, and ethical AI responses. 

Can Lawyers Use AI Prompts for Tasks Such as Client Intake or Developing Case Theories?

Yes. Lawyers can use AI to streamline client intake, spot initial legal issues in documents, or brainstorm case theories. However, all outputs must be reviewed by a legal professional and should never replace human legal judgment.

How Can Lawyers Ensure AI-Generated Content is Reliable and Ethical?

Build a verification step into your workflow. Cross-check all AI-produced legal content and ensure alignment with the regulatory requirements, ethical obligations, and firm policies.

Can I Input Confidential Client Information into an AI Prompt?

No, not on public or unsecured platforms. Use encrypted, private tools—such as Spellbook’s Word add-in—for safe handling of sensitive legal content.

Can Prompts Help with Legal Marketing and Business Development?

Yes. Prompts can generate blog outlines, social media drafts, email marketing content, and plain-language summaries for newsletters.

How Do Bar Associations and Courts View Lawyers Using AI Prompts?

Guidance is evolving, but recurring themes require that lawyers maintain transparency, supervise all outputs, and mitigate risks. Lawyers remain responsible for the content they use or deliver, and using AI doesn’t change that.

‍